Gary E. Miller <g...@rellim.com>: > It gets worse. Looks like l_fp needs to be int64_t, not uint64_t. > Sometimes l_fp's are subtracted to get an offset.
It doesn't matter. All those calculations are casted to within an inch of
their lives. :-)
> And weird things happen in lfp_intv_to_tspec() to guess if l_fp is
> unsigned or signed...
Yes, they do. I inherited that logic.
Be very, very careful about changing any of this stuff. I got it to where
it is by a series of provably behavior-preserving steps from the old code.
The corner cases are tricky.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
Please consider contributing to my Patreon page at https://www.patreon.com/esr
so I can keep the invisible wheels of the Internet turning. Give generously -
the civilization you save might be your own.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
