Gary E. Miller <g...@rellim.com>: > It gets worse. Looks like l_fp needs to be int64_t, not uint64_t. > Sometimes l_fp's are subtracted to get an offset.
It doesn't matter. All those calculations are casted to within an inch of their lives. :-) > And weird things happen in lfp_intv_to_tspec() to guess if l_fp is > unsigned or signed... Yes, they do. I inherited that logic. Be very, very careful about changing any of this stuff. I got it to where it is by a series of provably behavior-preserving steps from the old code. The corner cases are tricky. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> Please consider contributing to my Patreon page at https://www.patreon.com/esr so I can keep the invisible wheels of the Internet turning. Give generously - the civilization you save might be your own.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel