Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net>: > > e...@thyrsus.com said: > > That soumds like a request for two two different *install* productions. > > Noted. > > I could easily imagine a rats-nest.
True, but that's orthogonal to whether it's a rat's nest at choice-of-config time or a rat's nest at choice-of-install time. > Why just two? How about a no-ntpviz option? How about a no-clients option? > > The latter gets "interesting". I think there are two types of clients. > There are things like ntpq and ntomon that are used by humans poking around. > I think there are some that would be useful from scripts, but don't have a > handy example. > > The other option tangled up here is that buildprep drags in gnuplot and > friends. I don't think there is any solution that will make everybody happy and not generate demands for ever finer ways to slice up the build. Which suggests, in turn, that I should cavalierly ignore the whole issue and let the packagers fret about it. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel