While I cannot speak specifically to NTP, SHA (without any suffix) has been used on other contexts to mean SHA-1. I've also never encountered SHA-0 being used in any standard. So, if NTP is actually using it and it's not just a misunderstanding, that would be a first for me. I suspect it is SHA-1 throughout.
Greg On Fri, Jan 27, 2017, 9:07 PM Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> wrote: > Matthew Selsky <matthew.sel...@twosigma.com>: > > Where do we get SHA-0, aka "sha", keytype support from if we remove the > in-tree public domain version? > > To my knowledge the only SHA we have in tree is SHA-1. I think you can > only > get SHA-0 via OpenSSL. > -- > <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a> > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@ntpsec.org > http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
