Daniel Franke <dfoxfra...@gmail.com>:
> If SHA-0 has ever been used in NTP that's news to me. It was broken pretty
> quickly after publication and never saw much use. Pretty sure any
> documentation which refers to it is confused.
There were repeated references to "SHA and SHA-1". I don't see how that
could reasonablt disambiguate to anything but "SHA and SHA-1".
> I would prefer that OpenSSL implementations of primitives get used when
> available, for performance reasons which translate directly to improved
> precision.
Well, Matt has expressed a parallel desire. Maybe he'll ship a patch.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
