Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net>:
>
> > The successful scalarization of both 64-bit timestamp types has now been
> > achieved. There's a draft about how this was done in the blog repo:
> > _drafts/
> > cant-we-all-just-get-a-long.ad
>
> How much testing has been done?
If you're running any pull from the last three days, you're testing it.
> TESTFRAME would have helped for this sort of change.
TESTFRAME would have helped with a lot of things. If you know of any way
to eliminate the code-path split that sunk the concept, I'm all ears.
> I know about l_fp. What's the second 64-bit timestamp type?
It's called time64_t. It used to be vint64. It's used for calendar
computations. I think it has identical semantics to l_fp; at some
point I might try unifying the two.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
