the tags were pushed. maybe git pull --tags ? On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:25 AM Sanjeev Gupta <gha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> wrote: > > My proposal is that we change this before more water has gone under > the dam. That is: > > 1. VERSION should correspond to the last tag, not tne next one. > > 2. It should *not* be bumped when we ship 0.9.6 - that will bring it > into sync with the new convention. > > 3. After 0.9.6, I will add logic to bump the contents of VERSION after > shipping to devel/release, with --major, --minor, and --point > options. > > > I can see commit 76e974cf > > sanjeev@X201wily:~/SRC/ntpsec$ git show 76e974cf > commit 76e974cf16da204c6da73d6fa204677d94990088 > Author: Mark Atwood <mark.atw...@ntpsec.org> > Date: Fri Dec 30 21:16:45 2016 +0000 > > version 0.9.6 > > Signed-off-by: Mark Atwood <mark.atw...@ntpsec.org> > > but > sanjeev@X201wily:~/SRC/ntpsec$ git describe > NTPsec_0_9_5_1-547-gb6b2dd0 > > Is this a missing tag in git? > -- > Sanjeev Gupta > +65 98551208 <+65%209855%201208> http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@ntpsec.org > http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
