Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net>:
>
> e...@thyrsus.com said:
> > While this is in some ways a tempting thought, I think the energy we might
> > spend on this would be better directed towards a newer language that *is*
> > suitable for soft realtime and has good provability properties for security.
> > Rust or Go seem like the obvious candidates.
>
> How widely available are Rust and/or Go?
Every Unix-like system, for sure. Checking...Rust has a Windows port.
So does Go. Are there any other tarhets you're worried about?
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
