Gary E. Miller <g...@rellim.com>: > Sadly, PPS with the current algorithm should bump up to sampling every > one-half second. Some even want 10 Hz or even 100 Hz. > > Let us leave it on the long-term to-do list and not hash over it now. > The subject is complicated and contentious. Way too many moving parts > in a core chunk of the code to touch without TESTFRAME. I also expect > TESTFRAME will smoke out some of these issues and also have its own > different timer loop needs.
Hm. I think I get it - and you've just added a pretty powerful reason to
eventually pull the refclocks into a separate daemon by telling me I need to
get ntpd itself out of the PPS-watching business entirely in order to get
rid of that timer.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
