On 2016-08-11 21:28 +0000, Mark Atwood wrote: > It is time for another point release. > > I've received enough private communications from people who are successfuilly > running lab machines on tip, and people who are successfully running lab > machines on the previous point release, and that my work with the CII is > illuminating the need for proof of motion, that I have decided to make another > point release.
Can you quantify what 'lab machine' means here? Are we talking scientific laboratories running science equipment or general purpose lab workstations? > I understand the objection that we do not yet have a formalized release > criteria system, nor do we yet have a formalized checklist or automated > release > process.?? As nobody wise is yet running us in load production, that is not > yet > an issue. That's not really a reason to now have a formalised process if we're going to do it in the future we should do it now. It lets us have a chance at getting organised under it when it comes time for it to be a hard set of rules to follow it will be easier. <snip> > Please get your low risk bug fixes in in the next couple of days. > > Unless there is a credible stop reason, I will issue the tag this coming > Tuesday morning. Tuesday should be fine. There are some build changes I need to make to handle the new Python module I will do that this weekend. Amar.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
