Yo Hal! On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:28:29 -0700 Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net> wrote:
> g...@rellim.com said:
> >> I'm not sure why you would expect performance to be identical.
> > Because thhey use the same kernel generated time stamp and PLL
> > algorithm.
>
> There are two chunks of PPS code in the kernel with separate RFCs.
> One is getting the time stamp. The other is doing the PLL. The
> in-kernel PLL is totally different from anything in ntpd.
Interesting. So they start with the same time stamp, but PLL
differently. I wonder why the PLL's is so different?
I'll bet the kernell converence is much faster than the ntpsec
convergence. The best answer is likely in between.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
pgp3YFsjnuNz6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
