Hey Hal,
While we are in it, up to our ears, regarding setup and operation...
Is there a consensus on DDNS? There are a few services which offer 'free
dynamic DNS service':
http://www.noip.com/
http://www.xname.org/
http://freedns.afraid.org/
...and the delightful
https://www.duckdns.org/
Would it make sense to bake DDNS registration into the recipe and move away
from IP numbers?
Following that train of thought - all the way to the crash site - how about
certificates?
https://letsencrypt.org/
Baking in certs from the 'reference' free CA may also be a Good Idea, no?
- dan
-----Original Message-----
From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@ntpsec.org] On Behalf Of Hal Murray
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2016 9:28 AM
To: e...@thyrsus.com
Cc: gpsd-...@nongnu.org; devel@ntpsec.org
Subject: Re: Draft Stratum 1 Microserver HOWTO is up
e...@thyrsus.com said:
> One of the HOWTO's premises is that you have zeroconf. If you're only
> going to use it on your LAN, not make it public, you can get away with
> giving a .local address in your other configs. I'll add a clarification.
I thought part of the goal was to get more pool servers. That needs a fixed
IP Address.
I thought you avoided needing zeroconf by requiring a display and kbd on the
SBC.
If you are assuming zeroconf, I think that should be pointed out very early.
Are there any other assumptions that might not be obvious?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
