fallenpega...@gmail.com said: > It is looking like its time for the next release. Baring a stop, I will tag > it 0.9.3 and release on Tuesday, 2016-05-17, during OSCON.
A while ago, we had a discussion about the version number/string for releases vs working versions between releases. I don't remember the result. Did we reach a conclusion and/or did it get written down anyplace? I don't see anything in README - just that the string is in VERSION. > Please avoid checking in any major changes until after then. I think we need a slightly more complicated pre-release schedule. Working back, I'd like a day or two of running the proposed release, and I/we may need a day or two from an announcement to start running the proposed version. Ahead of that, it may take a day or more to finish up work in progress. If a quick release is important, we can save a few days by not checking in work-in-progress or being lucky and not having any work-in-progress. Similarly, we can save another day or two if everybody starts testing right away. > Hal, Daniel, Eric, Amar, please speak up, are you confident in what you have > checked in? Is the .../NEWS file up to date? All looks good from here, but I'm still looking. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
