Why you need older sdk with bugs, when you can use latest sdk with multiple targets for older sfos versions?
чт, 25 июл. 2019 г., 20:39 Tone Kastlunger <users.giulie...@gmail.com>: > +1 to this; > I had the same issue. It's confusing if you have to reinstall from scratch > for instance. > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:44 PM E.S. Rosenberg < > es.rosenberg+sailfishos....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> TL;DR - if we're doing version numbers for the SDK can they at least be >> the same as the SFOS to which they correspond? >> >> I assume this may have come up already in the past but I still want to >> ask this again. >> I noticed when recently redownloading the SDK that the versioning scheme >> had switched twice from numbers to dates and then back to numbers. >> >> As a rule I am a proponent of the dates versioning system since it allows >> me the user to easily know just how far behind I am. >> That being said in this case I am actually a proponent of version numbers >> with the caveat that the SDK version and the SFOS version number should be >> the same. >> When I was downloading the SDK I actually ended up cancelling the >> download and double checking the file listsing to see whether I was indeed >> downloading the most recent version because 2.x was also a SFOS version >> once upon a time. >> Regards, >> Eli >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list >> To unsubscribe, please send a mail to >> devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org > > _______________________________________________ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to > devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
_______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
