Oh, for some reason the project was indeed rebuilt by 07-Feb-2019. Last time I tried it two month ago and it worked well :-(.
I fixed some small new issues and now, wow, the problem with wayland is gone! This opens the possibility to develop and deploy at least the limited QQC2-based applications without a keyboard support. The last time I checked the build, I tried to develop a game for exactly that case in 90 minutes. If you're curious, you're welcome to check it out: zypper in one-to-nine QT_SCALE_FACTOR=2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/qt5.9/lib /usr/lib/qt5.9/bin/one-to-nine On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 4:58 PM rinigus <rinigus....@gmail.com> wrote: > > No go, file conflicts appeared for several packages trying to overwrite qt56 > installation. For example, qt5.9-qtdeclarative-qtquick was trying to write > /usr/lib/libQt5Quick.so.5 . I presume something changed in OBS and your > prefix path wasn't picked up. > > Rinigus > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 1:01 PM Alexander Akulich > <akulichalexan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The keypoints of the build: >> - upstream Qt-5.9.6 >> - Q_OS_SAILFISH platform [1] >> - Sailfish Theme added as a plugin instead of direct >> QGenericUnixTheme patching [2] >> - _qt5_version re-defined in the OBS project config [3] (default value >> defined in qt5 macros). >> - qt5 macros [4] extended and moved to own repository [5]. The added >> macros fix installations conflicts, improve compatibility with fedora >> specs and let us flexibly define Qt installation layout from the >> outside of qtbase. >> - qtchooser-config is built as a part of qtbase. >> >> [1] >> https://git.merproject.org/Kaffeine/qtbase/commit/7b8850fc9df17384a8cf53dc8b1d1e435e806794 >> [2] >> https://git.merproject.org/Kaffeine/qtbase/commit/816d9f7fe4fac0208d672086ae910cae772dcd32 >> [3] https://build.merproject.org/project/prjconf/home:Kaffeine:qt:prefix:5.9 >> [4] >> https://git.merproject.org/mer-core/qtbase/blob/mer-5.6/rpm/macros.qt5-default >> [5] https://git.merproject.org/Kaffeine/qt5-rpm-macros/blob/master/macros.qt5 >> >> Just try quickcontrols2/gallery and you'll see what's the problem >> (maliit keyboard doesn't show up and the window doesn't appear in >> lipstick home screen). >> >> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 1:07 PM rinigus <rinigus....@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Nice work, >> > >> > so, there is already something similar done. Can't find where do you >> > define _qt_prefix for your SPEC >> > (https://git.merproject.org/Kaffeine/qtbase/blob/sailfish-platform-5.9/rpm/qtbase.spec). >> > There are also bunch of conflicts defined there, no idea whether they >> > interfere. >> > >> > Which issues did you have with Wayland and keyboard (which of them, maliit >> > or qtvirtualkeyboard?). >> > >> > @tortoisedoc: Sounds like this upgrade (5.6->5.9) is as much political as >> > it is technical. As for 5.12, I don't know if there are some bugs there >> > that have to be fixed. When using flatpak platform with 5.12, I have >> > issues with QML Audio and some strange scaling of the map (latter could be >> > also my bug in mapbox gl qml plugin). On 5.11, all performed as it was >> > expected. So, either flatpak platform has still some issues at 5.12 or >> > 5.12 itself has some bugs. >> > >> > To sum up, no idea how much we can help with 5.9 transition and what's >> > holding it back specifically. >> > >> > Rinigus >> > >> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 11:17 AM Alexander Akulich >> > <akulichalexan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I experimented with a build in prefix in March 2018. I changed MER Qt >> >> build configuration to make it trivial to install an arbitrary number >> >> of versions simultaneously. I'll make PRs on git.merproject.org once >> >> Qt-5.9 support will be merged to master. >> >> There are two issues — wayland and virtual keyboard. I posted >> >> instruction in Sailfish OS Fan Club group in Telegram, here it is: >> >> >> >> >// Qt 5.9 for Sailfish OS (installed to /usr/lib/qt5.9 simultaneously to >> >> >the system Qt) >> >> >// To install (root or privileged): >> >> >ssu ar qt-prefix-5.9 >> >> >http://repo.merproject.org/obs/home:/Kaffeine:/qt:/prefix:/5.9/latest_armv7hl >> >> >zypper ref qt-prefix-5.9 >> >> >zypper in qt5.9-qtquickcontrols2-examples qt5.9-qtwayland >> >> > >> >> >// To remove (root or privileged): >> >> >zypper rm qt5.9* >> >> > >> >> >// To try out (nemo): >> >> >QT_SCALE_FACTOR=2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/qt5.9/lib >> >> >/usr/lib/qt5.9/examples/quickcontrols2/gallery/gallery >> >> > >> >> >This is a very first success build, please do not expect much :). >> >> > >> >> >P.S.: Select Material style in the settings at the right top corner to >> >> >make the demo a bit nicer. >> >> >> >> I also mostly built Qt-5.11, but it is not an LTS and IMO not as big >> >> step forward as 5.9, so I didn't evolve it. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 8:44 PM rinigus <rinigus....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > sounds like there are porting and licensing issues on the way of >> >> > getting qt 5.9 for SFOS (see logs from the last #mer-meeting). Its all >> >> > understandable, but it would be great to get a way forward. Not sure >> >> > whether it has been considered by others and I wonder whether we can >> >> > make a separate Qt 5.12 packages for /opt/qt512? >> >> > >> >> > From a quick test, it is possible to run non-silica applications as >> >> > well (tested with qmlscene and QML with plain Window). In that test, >> >> > even keyboard worked as expected. Look was non-native, but let it be >> >> > for now. >> >> > >> >> > So, I wonder, whether its possible to get Qt 5.12 compiled with >> >> > /opt/qt512 prefix and then use it for development using the latest libs >> >> > (new web browser?) and collaborate with other mobile Linux'es out >> >> > there. As far as I remember, Wayland was rather old and, maybe, it will >> >> > preclude Qt 5.12 compilation. @mal, though, had a newer version around >> >> > and it may serve a purpose for such project. Is there anything else >> >> > that should be considered? >> >> > >> >> > Cheers, >> >> > >> >> > Rinigus >> >> > >> >> > PS: Please consider it as request-for-comment and not as any kind of >> >> > statement nor call-for-action :) >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list >> >> > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to >> >> > devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list >> >> To unsubscribe, please send a mail to >> >> devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list >> > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to >> > devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org >> _______________________________________________ >> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list >> To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org > > _______________________________________________ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org _______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org