On Tuesday 14 January 2014 10:28 Luciano Montanaro wrote: > As far as I understand, the notation used is > major.minor.patch-packageversion, with the packageversion reserved > for the packager (changes to spec/yaml/ files). > > Since you are both the packager and the developer, you can always leave it > to 0. Maybe, if you only fix packaging issues without touching the code, > you could bump it instead of the patch version. > > I would bump the patch version number, and reset the packaging number to 0.
Yes, that sounds reasonable. Thanks > > Best regards, > Luciano > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Thomas Tanghus <tho...@tanghus.net> wrote: > > When packaging a bugfix release what is the best practice? > > > > 1. Just bumping the release number so the package name goes from harbour- > > appname-0.1-1.armv7hl to harbour-appname-0.1-2.armv7hl > > > > 2. Bump minor version from e.g. harbour-appname-0.1-1.armv7hl to harbour- > > appname-0.1.1-1.armv7hl > > > > 3. Both version and release from harbour-appname-0.1-1.armv7hl to harbour- > > appname-0.1.1-2.armv7hl -- Med venlig hilsen / Best Regards Thomas Tanghus _______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
