-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
currently, the Harbour QA process is quite frustrating, as problems are reported one after the other, with a delay of several days inbetween... reminds me of the old time cobol compilators! It would be cool if the efforts made by the developper to provide free native application were a bit more considered. Ok, I'm talking out of frustration, but I had my app rejected first because of naming conventions of the app itself (I didn't properly read the FAQ, but it is not stated either in the app submission page of Harbour), delay of 7 days, then because of rmp file naming convention (which I did not find clearly stated except in the rejection notification - 5 more days). Now I am waiting for next step (2 days for now...) I understand this is a lot of work, but what I suggest is : - - more controls and more information in the app submission page (testing the naming conventions of at least the files seems trivial) - - when doing QA, report all problems at once, not just the first one - - maybe provide a QA tool so that developpers could do this job and let jolla teams concentrate on real QA (power consumption, security checks, ...) Hope this does not sound too demanding... Best regards, Franck -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSz6f+AAoJEGEvoAir78RoEOsH/3jBwaf6MTpi0tRqVQXZDvsU nTUoc/H2zFWOFVDoSJqc6FQCQcPue5Fvu/tuGe8zEF8HPeW5Et08dmpGP7wdXurP VJhaG8LOHCMj9AhgPLPkFKJKMCqKR8H0PmbvOaEhj+zua6AdpzlOz4MOPaxeQltz FUbXwnrGNZQ/KRoM1NPJM8g9SkUmkg+1cBBS1ThhJuVP+jANBit9BFJuYnvh8HzO y6ODX+jpn1348p89PWrt1/dDzRqLw62kccf5G6nyaBumjKNdzodfU7/+i2C6wHNG tTfS46ytuebzm/5SMG9yJN77jg1bsFZlHPjiKUp+vLaU99RBWVlFaybJPJf1QAY= =uJPj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
