Le 28/12/2013 19:06, Artem Marchenko a écrit : > If you want something QML that works, I use this pure QML LocalStorage > approach for the last couple of years fine > - > https://github.com/amarchen/Wikipedia/blob/master/src/qml/components/DbDictionary.qml
I found inbetween that this is the approach promoted (for now) by Ubuntu Touch as well. > > Nowadays I would have started with wrapping QSettings though (and pull > requests to Wikipedia for changing LocalStorage use into QSettings > wrapper are welcome :)) > So as I understand it, QSettings might be better, but is not yet really usable from QML out of the box (needs a wrapper of some sort, some being developped by Nokia for example). But, what makes QSettings better thant LocalStorage ? Ans what makes LocalStorage better than QSettings ? here are my first bets: LocalStorage: (+) available in qml out of the box, more standard (HTML5 ??), more powerful (sql) (-) not directly human readable / editable, security concerns (all tables available to all qml apps ??) QSettings: (+) simple text files (?) (-) not directly usable from qml there must be some other points... Best regards, Franck _______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
