The two things are not related at all :)

Even "Linux", that is 100% opensource, has hundred of people paid to
contribute to it full time.

I know that the comparison is a bit unfair, but it's just to explain that
it can be normal to be paid to develop something that is opensource.
Can Jolla afford to rely completely on the community? They can't, at this
stage. They pay employees to develop some apps. This doesn't mean these
apps can't be opensourced for this reason. So probably there is a different
reason that only Jolla can explain.

Cheers.


On 25 December 2013 22:17, Andrey Kozhevnikov <coderusin...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I think there are persons in Jolla who receive a salary for developing
>
> because of that Jolla Core is not opensource (yet?)
>
>
> On 26.12.2013 03:05, Vincent B. wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure about it, since I'm unable to find the sources for Jolla
>> core apps such as the app clock. I'd like to add the ability to select a
>> timer's duration at the second precision level.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Vincent
>> _______________________________________________
>> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
>



-- 
Andrea Grandi -  Software Engineer / Qt Ambassador / Nokia Developer
Champion
website: http://www.andreagrandi.it
_______________________________________________
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list

Reply via email to