Ronni wrote: > copy protection library is just supposed to make cracking > and copying process hard enough so that most of the people > will just choose to use store for getting their rpm's. And > to give app developers easier ways to give some protection > their applications so direct .rpm file copy from device to > device wont work, so you don't have to invent the wheel again > and again by creating their own copy protection solutions. And > if you have a danger of beeing blacklisted from Store if your > detected of using cracked applications it also might scare some > people from using cracked apps.
My point, *EXACTLY*. I am so glad that Jolla is going to do it the PROPER way. Oh, and while we're at security-related topics, just out of curiosity, can you please share how security of Android applications will be handled? Will the user be shown and requested to accept Android permissions upon installation of an Android app? On BB10 it used to be so, and I could e.g. disallow access to contacts or camera if I didn't want it. But since 10.2 OS update all permissions seem to be granted automatically and the user is not even shown which permissions are being granted, let alone being offered to accept/reject any... Michal _______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
