Hi Dago, Am 06.10.2013 10:46, schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
>> RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibopendbx1 += CSWlibstdc++6 >> >> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibopendbx1 += >> shared-lib-pkgname-mismatch|file=opt/csw/lib/libopendbxplus.so.1.0.0|soname=libopendbxplus.so.1|pkgname=CSWlibopendbx1|expected=CSWlibopendbxplus1 >> +CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibopendbx1 += >> shared-lib-pkgname-mismatch|file=opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libopendbxplus.so.1.0.0|soname=libopendbxplus.so.1|pkgname=CSWlibopendbx1|expected=CSWlibopendbxplus1 > > Why are you not just use the standard naming scheme for the package? The files libopendbx.so and libopendbxplus.so belong together and I didn't wanted to create a package with one file in at that can't be used with other packages. Ihsan -- ih...@dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
