On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:52:48PM +0000, slowfrank...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > Added: csw/mgar/pkg/dconf/trunk/Makefile > =================================================================== > --- csw/mgar/pkg/dconf/trunk/Makefile (rev 0) > +++ csw/mgar/pkg/dconf/trunk/Makefile 2013-05-04 13:52:47 UTC (rev 20987) > @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ > +# $Id$ > +# TODO (release-critical prefixed with !, non release-critical with *) > +# > +NAME = dconf > +VERSION = 0.5.1 > +GARTYPE = v2 > + > +DESCRIPTION = low-level configuration system for glib > +define BLURB > + dconf is a low-level configuration system. Its main purpose is to > + provide a backend to GSettings on platforms that dont already have > + configuration storage systems. > +endef > + > +MASTER_SITES = $(GNOME_MIRROR) > +DISTFILES = $(NAME)-$(VERSION).tar.bz2
You can use DISTNAME instead of $(NAME)-$(VERSION). Note to self: we should fix the template. > +GARCOMPILER = GNU > + > +EXTRA_PKG_CONFIG_DIRS = $(prefix)/X11/lib We should not be using /opt/csw/X11, we should be using system X11 instead. > +EXTRA_INC = $(prefix)/include/gtk-2.0 > +EXTRA_INC += $(prefix)/include/cairo > +EXTRA_INC += $(prefix)/include/pango-1.0 > +EXTRA_INC += $(prefix)/lib/gtk-2.0/include/ > +EXTRA_INC += $(prefix)/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/ > +EXTRA_INC += $(prefix)/include/atk-1.0/ This doesn't look right. Normally, you only have -I/opt/csw/include (which is the default already) and source code refers to relative paths underneath. What happens when you remove these lines? > +BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWlibdbusdev > +BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWpkgconfig > +BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWglib2devel > +BUILD_DEP_PKGS += CSWgtk2devel > + > +RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS += CSWlibgio2-0-0 > +RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS += CSWglib2 > +RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS += CSWlibdbus > + > +PACKAGES += CSWdconf > +SPKG_DESC_CSWdconf = $(DESCRIPTION) > +RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWdconf += CSWlibdconf0 > + > +PACKAGES += CSWlibdconf0 > +SPKG_DESC_CSWlibdconf0 = $(DESCRIPTION), library > +PKGFILES_CSWlibdconf0 += $(call pkgfiles_lib,libdconf.so) > + > +PACKAGES += CSWlibdconf-dev > +SPKG_DESC_CSWlibdconf-dev = $(DESCRIPTION), development files > +PKGFILES_CSWlibdconf-dev += $(PKGFILES_DEVEL) > +PKGFILES_CSWlibdconf-dev += $(call > baseisadirs,$(datadir),vala/vapi/dconf\.deps) > +PKGFILES_CSWlibdconf-dev += $(call > baseisadirs,$(datadir),vala/vapi/dconf\.vapi) > +RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibdconf-dev += CSWlibdconf0 > + > +PATCHFILES += 0001-Use-statvfs-for-checking-filesystem-type.patch > +PATCHFILES += 0002-Remove-linker-flags-remove-c89-request.patch > +PATCHFILES += 0003-Add-gio-includes.patch > + > +CONFIGURE_ARGS = $(DIRPATHS) > +CONFIGURE_ARGS += CFLAGS="-std=c99 -D__EXTENSIONS__" __EXTENSIONS__ is a flag meaningful for Solaris Studio, is it meaningful for GCC at all? I would think it isn't. Maciej
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
