2012/5/31 Peter FELECAN <pfele...@opencsw.org>: > > "Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński" <mac...@opencsw.org> writes: > >> 2012/5/29 <pfele...@users.sourceforge.net> >> >>> +# why is this? .so are just symbolic links: >>> +CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWt1lib-dev += archall-devel-package >>> >> >> Discussion on maintainers: >> http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-February/011234.html >> >> Are you sure that you get identical header results on both architectures? > > Quite. BTW, the headers are not generated but supplied as is from > upstream. TBT[1]
You can override the error and package arch-independent headers, but for the checking purposes we decided that a cost of a mistake is less if you create arch-dependent packages by default. The only downside is a tiny increase in catalog size (completely dwarfed by other packages we have). If you make a mistake by creating an arch-independent package, the costs are much higher, because it will cause weird compilation problems, draining hours of people's time. For simplicity, we always create arch-dependent development packages. If you create arch-independent package, you'll need to add overrides, that's all. The choice is of course, yours. Maciej _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
