Hi Peter, Am 16.05.2012 um 10:31 schrieb Peter FELECAN: > Dagobert Michelsen <d...@opencsw.org> writes: >> Am 15.05.2012 um 16:05 schrieb pfele...@opencsw.org: >>> Please install the following packages. They are prerequisites to build >>> emacs. >>> >>> CSWlibdbus-glib-dev >>> CSWlibgdk-pixbuf-dev >>> CSWlibgif-dev >>> CSWlibglib2-dev >>> CSWlibgtk2-dev >> >> Doing this now on unstable10*. The new glib2 is not available on Solaris 9. > > This means tha I can provide the new package only on solairs 10, isn't > it?
At least it is the easiest way to go. You would need different dependencies for Solaris 9 as a recent GTK is almost unbuildable on Solaris 9. Do you need emacs for Solaris 9? >>> CSWlibicedevel >>> CSWlibsmdevel >>> CSWlibxawdevel >>> CSWx11renderproto >> >> I noticed you added /opt/csw/X11 to your latest recipe. This location is >> deprecated. It was >> our attempt to ship updated X11 libraries, but it failed as the new SONAMES >> are not compatible >> with present accelerated libraries for 3D and other things shipped by >> Oracle. Do you really >> need something from /opt/csw/X11? It feasible it should be rebuild to be in >> /opt/csw directly >> if it does not collide with other things. I have not installed these last >> four as the presence >> is usually bad as it automatically adds dependencies to stuff which should >> not use it. > > Well, without /opt/csw/X11 the Emacs that I can provide is very poor > from the stand point of user interface: limited X11/Athena Widget based, > curses based and, no GTK based one; this is a regression from the > previous package. Which X11 packages do you specifically need? For my needs Solaris 10 provided everything I needed for my packages, but YMMV. If there are really tiny things missing we could keep providing them if proven useful. > Next week I'll try some variations in order to obtain something > acceptable but I cannot guarantee. > > If installing these packages introduces a risk for other packaging > activities, can we set up a special, separated, system where I can build > a fully functional Emacs? Yes, you could. But the idea is more to actually remove the packages in /opt/csw/X11 in the next release, so building against them just makes this step harder in the future (or delayes research...) > Note that I'm not available until the beginning of the next week and I'm > incommunicado[1] until then. > > [1] the beautifully agglutinated "érintkezésilehetőségnélküli" is the > Hungarian equivalent... Since when do you speak hungarian? Best regards -- Dago (is impressed) -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
