* wah...@users.sourceforge.net <wah...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Revision: 11928 > http://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/gar/?rev=11928&view=rev > Author: wahwah > Date: 2010-12-14 09:53:22 +0000 (Tue, 14 Dec 2010) > > Log Message: > ----------- > protobuf: Split off shared libraries > > Also, experiment with grouping descriptions by package. It's a different way > from the way most of the package descriptions are written. It looks slightly > uglier, because gar's variable naming is designed for grouping by variable > type. However, I found myself often thinking in a by-package manner, and > grouping these by package helps me review the build description.
That's IMHO a very sensible approach and one that I also follow for bigger build descriptions. Otherwise, I found myself doing adjustments in one place and missing out on related adjustments elsewhere in the description way too often. Examples are * Subversion [1] (although your approach is even more consequent as it also relocates PACKAGES) * Postfix [2] (when it comes to FEATURES) Just some feedback. Sebastian [1]https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/subversion/trunk/Makefile [2]https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/postfix/trunk/Makefile _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
