Hello. I've got several Python packages on review. But I'm not sure if the naming policy applies to the spec file the same way as it applies on the resulting packages.
socketIO-client RHBZ #1300092 ripe-atlas-sagan RHBZ #1300217 ripe-atlas-cousteau RHBZ #1300219 ripe-atlas-tools RHBZ #1300222 For each package, the build creates python2-name and python3-name subpackage containing the Python modules. But the main package is created only in the case of ripe-atlas-tools, which contains executable utilities. The other packages don't contain any utilities. Should be the spec file prefixed with python-? Does this apply both to packages containing primarily the utilities? Or is there a better and consistent naming scheme for this case? Thank you, Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
