Am 16.01.2016 um 22:07 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga <l...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:Does Oracle include ZFS in their ISO by default?No, and as far as I know they don't contribute to ZFS on Linux. There is a distinction between ZFS and OpenZFS that's kinda important. ZFS on Linux is based on OpenZFS, not ZFS. There're incompatible features since pool version 28 in each, so they're essentially diverging. I don't know if that qualifies them as defacto forks (either from each other, or from ZFS pool version 28). Anyway, Oracle only includes ZFS in Solaris. And they continue to contribute to Btrfs.They do, however, include DTrace in their distribution, which remains CDDL licensed in their distribution
stop that FUD - CDDL is not the problem - MIXING is the topic and don't bring "cdrecrord" to the topic, the author is the problem back to topic:even if DTrace would be closed source Oracle could include it because tehy are the *copyright holder* and can release it under *every* license they like to do
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
