On 29/11/15 18:18, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:10:25 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
Solved by changing .spec file name as set in PackageDB.
The developer himself uses both kpmcore and KPMcore in the project, so I
think there's no problem in adopting KPMcore as name in Fedora.
Sorry for the noise.
Both
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Spec_File_Naming
and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming
apply.
And it can be quite tiresome, if such issues come up during review.
Yes, as the reviewer in this case I would definitely have objected to a
mixed case name on the basis of the guidelines.
Of course the spec file I was reviewing wasn't mixed case and I didn't
notice that the bug title was different.
It always used to be the case that the request for a package to be added
to pkgdb was rejected if the title didn't match, so has a bug been
introduced there by the new pkgdb process?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
