On 4 November 2015 at 02:20, Toby Goodwin <t...@paccrat.org> wrote: > As well as Fedora itself, we need to get the infrastructure IPv6 ready. > My company has developed an IPv6 health checker. Given a domain, it > tests its nameservers, webservers, and mailservers for IPv6 readiness. > > Currently fedoraproject.org scores 4 out of 9, so there's some room for > improvement! > > https://www.mythic-beasts.com/ipv6/health-check?domain=fedoraproject.org > > It seems odd that there are AAAA records for ns0[25], but they point to > "dead:beef" addresses that are unreachable. Is this deliberate? Seems > like it will just slow things down for any resolver that happens to > try the IPv6 address first. (And of course the domain is completely > unresolvable from a "pure" IPv6 client.) >
Thank you for letting us know this. No it is not deliberate... and I would really like to know this outside of a message marketing your service on a mailing list. > Toby. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
