As I found this discussion interesting and I believe FESCo is the right authority to help with this, I have opened a ticket https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1495 for the FESCo meeting on Wednesday, to discuss it.
Regards, Jan On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 02.11.2015 um 02:28 schrieb Sérgio Basto: > >> On Dom, 2015-11-01 at 17:53 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sex, 2015-10-30 at 17:47 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >>>> >>>>> At the third round of Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, that just >>>>> ends, has been Fedora 23 Final-RC10 declared as GOLD. >>>>> GA of this release is planed on Tuesday 2015-Nov-03. >>>>> >>>>> Today we got 531 updates for F23 , IMO, you should include it on Fedora >>>> 23 Final before GA , doesn't make sense (to me) after download an ISO >>>> have 1/2 Giga of updates, but this happens since RedHad 9 at least . >>>> IMO, testing team should respin ISO with updates and testing again . >>>> I have some difficulty in following all development, fortunately Fedora >>>> is always at great speed, but it is not easy to follow. And do more >>>> tests we not lose anything, IMHO. >>>> >>> >>> The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in the >>> installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If not >>> it's too much of a moving target to try and QA and ensure everything >>> works as expected. To freeze is a fairly standard procedure for all >>> distro development. >>> >> >> Make an respin for F23 with stable updates, IMHO, should not break >> anything, because at this stage, just stable things are being pushed >> > > in theory > > it should be just one more loop in testing phase, anyway if breaks >> something test team can freeze process again, until provide a fix. >> > > who does the work for *what* benefit? > it's just wasting ressources and manpower > > who cares about the install ISO when you ave anyways to apply updates > after or in the best case *due* setup > > This is not new !, respins of fedoraunity was an example and we already >> have living respins [1], so we just need do new respin officially!. >> Shouldn't be a big deal, If I'm not mistaken. >> > > and fedoraunity finally gave up because lack of ressources > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
