On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" <jan.kratoch...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push > > an update for F23 also. > > I do not understand why a major rebase could be permitted after all the F-23 > freezing stages? It may cause FTBFSes or even broken builds. What is then > all the release engineering good for? Why not to just run Rawhide then? >
I have to agree. I have been bitten too many times by minor tweaks breaking builds in the OS. However the rules where a completely frozen build system was causing problems in the past so I am expecting make is considered less important than gcc? > This situation may be a FAQ, sorry I do not read every mail here. I did not > want to be negative/discouraging, just I have seen such FTBFS regression(s) in > Fedora in the past. > > > Jan > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
