On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 03:05:42AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 07:37:15PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >> fedora-repos should have all the keys needed for upgrade. So the only 
> >> thing needing the keys is mock. However I'm not sure you should include 
> >> rpmfusion keys in Fedora.
> >
> > On a related note, something that I thought about when trying to
> > verify old Fedora keys...
> > Would it be possible for people who create those keys (or other people
> > from release-engineering who can verify that they keys are correct) to
> > sign them with their private keys and upload the resulting signatures
> > to public key servers? It would provide an additional verification
> > path. Distribution package signing keys are important enough for this
> > to be worth the extra work imho.
> 
> Well if that needs to be done it should be maintained by rel-eng, but
> ultimately there might be a better way to deal with it than
> duplicating a bunch of files.

Duplicating? What do you mean?

Zbyszek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to