W dniu 28.08.2015 o 18:02, Matěj Cepl pisze:
On 2015-08-28, 13:01 GMT, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Yes, I have read it. But lot of maintainers did not.
Example specfile:
Source1: %{name}.score
Patch0: %{name}-0.7.1-userpmopts.patch
Patch1: %{name}-0.7.1-64bitfix.patch
Patch2: %{name}-0.7.1-blit-crash.patch
Well, perhaps instead of non-sensical (meaning, it cannot get to
any meaningful resolution) discussion on devel, I would think
that filing a bug could lead to something?
You mean mass bug reporting for each package where spec file lacks
information about patches?
Prefer to spend that time on fixing those packages where aarch64 or
other secondary architecture is not handled.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
