On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:33 PM, drago01 <drag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Wei-Lun Chao <blue...@member.fsf.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there already any discussion about: >> rename arch name "noarch" to "all" >> rename arch name "x86_64" to "amd64" >> rename package name "kernel-PAE" to "kernel" >> and even rename package name "kernel" to "linux" > > Why? > That doesn't solve any problem(s) but in fact would create some so no > its not a good idea.
The only one remotely reasonable is the kernel-PAE thing, but it wouldn't be a rename. It would be shipping only a PAE enabled kernel for i686 and just calling it kernel. This would match what almost all other distros do here and it's probably time we drop the non-PAE kernel. josh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
