On 2 August 2015 at 22:57, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 August 2015 at 15:29, Marcin Haba <marcin.h...@bacula.pl> wrote: >> My image of configuration files is that they are files for read/write >> purpose by design, because they enables _configure_ something >> (application, service, single program, script...whatever). If they are >> dedicated only for reading then from my point of view they lose >> "configuration" meaning (something like WORM storage ;-) ). >> > > This is probably an argument for having shell configuration fragments > packaged under /usr/lib/bash/profile.d rather than /etc/profile.d.
.. or /usr/share/bash/profile.d, perhaps. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
