On 29 July 2015 at 20:08, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:03:00PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: >> >> "The Emacs add-on packaging guidelines no longer stipulate that packages >> >> which >> >> also bundle support for Emacs should split out those Emacs files into >> >> separate >> >> sub-packages. This package should instead ship those files with the main >> >> package which should also Require emacs-filesystem. See >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs for more detail." >> > And once again the wording is weak. It says "should". Three times even. >> What's wrong with the word "should"? What am I missing? Seems like the >> usual use of this word to me? > > Presuambly this: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt >
OK, so that's exactly what I intended when I wrote the text of the bug report (I had that definition in mind) - I thought there might be unforseen valid reasons not to merge the emacs- subpackage into the main package, and hence didn't use "must". So, I am still not seeing my error here but I would like to, so I can avoid it in future... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
