On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:08:52AM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> I think that C-style operators (&, &&) are better than verbose
> COBOL-style ones because they are consistent with relation operators (>,
> >= and so on) already used by rpm. Secondly, they don't introduce
> conflict with existing meaning - "Requires: foo AND bar" is valid syntax
> in rpm <= 4.12, equivalent to requiring three packages separately.
Actually it's "Requires: (foo AND bar)". We currently insist on the
parens to be 100% backwards compatible. It also has the advantage
that the parser knows when the dependency ends and the next one
starts.
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
