On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 07:39 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > > > On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 21:30:40 +0200 > > Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > > ...snip... > > > > > Protected multilib versions: polkit-0.113-1.fc21.x86_64 > > > != > > > polkit-0.112-7.fc21.1.i686 > > > > This is due to polkit splitting out a polkit-libs package between > > those > > two versions. This makes it only include the polkit-libs package > > instead of a polkit.i686. > > > > You should be able to just remove the old polkit.i686, but I agree > > it > > needs to be handed by the package cleanly for upgrades. > > Oops. Is there a way to handle this cleanly at all? I can’t just do > polkit-libs.i686 Obsoletes: polkit.i686, that would break 32-bit-only > systems. > Mirek
The clean way to handle this is for the polkit package to have:
Requires: polkit-libs%{?_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
This will guarantee that the new package has a polkit-libs package that
matches the currently-installed polkit. (And if you had both before,
you'll get both after, too).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
