Am 01.06.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Ryan S. Brown <rya...@redhat.com> wrote:A local DNS resolver would certainly be a surprise to me. Again, this comes back to the expectation that a server isn't hopping networks or running somewhere un-trusted where there's a high risk of bad actors.It's not just bad actors. Sometimes things break or you need to reconfigure your upstream resolvers. With a local caching resolver, this Just Works (tm). With the status quo, it requires restarting everything
WHAT - the opposite is true, glibc don't cache nameserver respones and *now* if you change something on your central resolvers it gets visible on any machine in your network
with having a local cache on 1000 nodes *then* it requires restarting everyting - so exactly the opposite you are saying
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
