Sorry, upon closer review doesn't look like that quite matches. Couldn't find a bug... if someone knows of one, please let me know, otherwise I'll create one. I used the workaround, and that worked fine btw; but doesn't seem like it should be the solution.
Thanks! On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Gerald B. Cox <gb...@bzb.us> wrote: > I found the bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141513 > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Gerald B. Cox <gb...@bzb.us> wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:44 PM, gil <punto...@libero.it> wrote: >> >>> a fix for this problem is: >>> (see >>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/java-service-wrapper.git/tree/java-service-wrapper.spec >>> >>> ) >>> # rpmbuild < 4.6 support >>> %if ! 0%{?__isa_bits} >>> %ifarch x86_64 ia64 ppc64 sparc64 s390x alpha ppc64le aarch64 >>> %global __isa_bits 64 >>> %else >>> %global __isa_bits 32 >>> %endif >>> %endif >>> >> >> I've just run into this problem with the sphinx build - which built fine >> with 2.2.7-1 on January 21st - which was before this thread started. Is the >> workaround the recommendation? Was a mock bug created? >> > >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
