On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:35:50 -0500 Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu> wrote:
> >>>>> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> writes: > > KF> Right, as I noted at the end of that other long mail, there's > KF> discussion about a 'urgent updates' repo for security updates. > > Why not, when going to mash, mash only updates marked a security and > get those out immediately, then mash everyhing else. Is there a > concern about dependencies in that case? Several problems with that (at least): * Mash has no ability/code to tell when something is a 'security update'. It operates on koji tags. So, I suppose we could make a f21-security-updates tag for it to operate on, but that would add a bunch of complexity to an already complex process and we would have to figure out the movement into and out of that tag, etc. * Yes, there's a concern about deps. This is also an issue/concern for the 'urgent updates' repo. kevin
pgpcCKxVx9rk8.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
