On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:13:23 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> On 02/17/2015 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >>> Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as >> >>> Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current >> >>> Fedora and the new easy-for-beginners repository)? >> >> Because this would establish a 2-class society, with double >> >> standards standards and so on. >> > >> > If the distinction were drawn based on _who_ rather than _what and >> > why_, it would. (And that was fundamentally the problem with the old >> > Core vs. Extras.) But no one is proposing a _society_-based distinction >> > -- instead, a _technical_ one. >> >> I know and understand this, but I expect the outcome to be the same: >> >> Ring 0 == Red Hat >> Ring 1 == The Red Hat business/RHEL-irrelevant parts >> >> In other words, on the techicall level I do not see any difference to >> CentOS+RHEL and to Core+Extras >> >> On the political and social level, .... it raises questions going far >> beyond these consideration > > I wonder why it has become silent in this thread already?
Because commentary on the proposal was made, and nothing new has been resubmitted? > Is there another place where those "ideas" get discussed? Not that I'm aware of. josh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
