>> This is an opportunity for community members for whom i686 is a >> passion to join the team to participate in the bugfixing required. >> We previously called out the need for assistance[2], but had no >> substantial response. We hope that being transparent about our >> priorities will prompt interested community members to help. If you >> are interested to help, here are some resources to get started: > <snip> > > Given our past history with passive requests for help, I think it > might be beneficial to put a time limit on things. For example, if no > i686 Kernel SIG steps up and agrees to handle bugs on that platform, > we should strongly consider demoting i686 to secondary architecture > for installation media at the Fedora 23 branch point (about six months > from now). > > Note: I'm only suggesting that we would demote the kernel and install > media, *NOT* the 32-bit runtime libraries on an x86_64 system; we > would still need to be building those.
How do you propose demoting to secondary only the kernel/install without the userspace? Do you mean de-emphasise the i686 bit platform? Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
