On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I have missed that discussion, so if it has been decided already, I'm late. > But my feeling is that we're going to shoot ourselves in the foot with this. > Our QA test matrices will explode once again, and we will be offering too > many images with almost indistinguishable differences to our users. > > The only difference seems to be branding (which can be generic) and > partitioning scheme. People installing Server and Cloud are usually pretty > capable of choosing their preferred partitioning scheme. I think this is not > worth 3 more netinst images. > > But I guess most of my objection is caused by the QA point of view. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct My sentiments too - One netinstall is enough, though I'd expand the menu on it for more selectivity. I haven't looked recently but I think there are more package groups than those listed on the right-hand panel of the netinstall menu. Have the desktops on the left panel and the package groups on the right and mix-and-match. -- OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists http://www.znmeb.mobi/stories/osjourno-robust-power-tools-for-digital-journalists Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
