I have a fairly standard FC20 setup which I started upgrading by
fedup --network 21 --product=workstation
There were 109 packages for which there was no upgrade; 62 are
*-debuginfo, 12 are from various oddball repos (adobe, simulavr, etc),
but 36 are I believe regular Fedora Core 20 packages, including fairly
important ones like 8 related to the R language.
Two of those result in packaging conflicts and fedup warns about
'upgrade at your own risk':
icedtea-web-1.5.2-0.fc20.x86_64 requires
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1:1.7.0.71-2.5.3.0.fc20.x86_64
R-core-3.1.2-1.fc20.x86_64 requires tk-1:8.5.14-1.fc20.x86_64,
tcl-1:8.5.14-1.fc20.x86_64, libicu-50.1.2-10.fc20.x86_64
I imagine there will be fc21 packages for those eventually, so should I
file a bugzilla report on it, or go ahead with the install and wait for
the new versions? If reporting, would it be against fedup or specific
packages?
yum list icedtea-web R-core java-1.7.0-openjdk tk tcl libicu
returns:
Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Installed Packages
R-core.x86_64 3.1.2-1.fc20 @updates
icedtea-web.x86_64 1.5.2-0.fc20 @updates
java-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64 1:1.7.0.71-2.5.3.0.fc20 @updates
libicu.i686 50.1.2-10.fc20 installed
libicu.x86_64 50.1.2-10.fc20 installed
tcl.x86_64 1:8.5.14-1.fc20 installed
tk.x86_64 1:8.5.14-1.fc20 installed
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
