On 2 December 2014 at 11:27, Owen Taylor <otay...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 11:12 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> > On 2 December 2014 at 09:22, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org>
> > wrote:
> >         On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:15:38PM +0100, jfm...@free.fr
> >         wrote:
> >         > Now it seems Fedora's downloads have been steadily going
> >         downwards
> >         > and it is highly improbable that is due to a spectacular
> >         increase of
> >         > number of people setting local mirrors.
> >
> >         Smooge is working on some updated statistics, and from what
> >         I've seen,
> >         it's mostly flat, but not actually steadily downwards. More on
> >         the
> >         other things later. :)
> >
> > Temporary URL for picture of things from 2007 til last month:
> >
> > https://smooge.fedorapeople.org/stats-2014/
> >
> > I am hoping to have a permanent url and updated set by next month.
>
> Is there some explanation why there the Fedora vs. Epel split in the
> last graph so closely tracks the x86_32 vs. x86_64 split in the second
> graph, as if all EPEL users were on x86_64 and all Fedora users were on
> x86_32?
>
>
As far as I can tell its coincidence but I will double check to see if I am
plotting the wrong data somewhere.



> - Owen
>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to