On 2 December 2014 at 11:27, Owen Taylor <otay...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 11:12 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On 2 December 2014 at 09:22, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> > > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:15:38PM +0100, jfm...@free.fr > > wrote: > > > Now it seems Fedora's downloads have been steadily going > > downwards > > > and it is highly improbable that is due to a spectacular > > increase of > > > number of people setting local mirrors. > > > > Smooge is working on some updated statistics, and from what > > I've seen, > > it's mostly flat, but not actually steadily downwards. More on > > the > > other things later. :) > > > > Temporary URL for picture of things from 2007 til last month: > > > > https://smooge.fedorapeople.org/stats-2014/ > > > > I am hoping to have a permanent url and updated set by next month. > > Is there some explanation why there the Fedora vs. Epel split in the > last graph so closely tracks the x86_32 vs. x86_64 split in the second > graph, as if all EPEL users were on x86_64 and all Fedora users were on > x86_32? > > As far as I can tell its coincidence but I will double check to see if I am plotting the wrong data somewhere.
> - Owen > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct