Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Why do you claim that? What requirements do you think we must provide
> for in our default browser that other browser we have packages for
> don't meet? I find Midori reasonable on x86_64. There is currently an
> i686 problem because a library it uses is compiled with an incorrect
> architecure (it uses instructions that aren't supported on hardware
> Fedora is upposed to support). So I have problems with it on i686, but
> this isn't directly a Midori problem. Seamonkey seems pretty reasonable
> as well.
That's a webkitgtk issue, look at how we handle this in QtWebKit.
(You have to build the library twice, as /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk* with the
WebKit JIT disabled and as /usr/lib/sse2/libwebkitgtk* with the JIT enabled.
The WebKit JavaScript JIT requires SSE2. The interpreter works fine without
it.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
