On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 08:52 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 7 November 2014 00:31, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > > Since gthumb does not follow the GNOME release schedule, we > > shouldn't push unstable versions of gthumb to rawhide. > > No? We push unstable GNOME to rawhide all the time; or is this more of > a case where we're worrying that a stable gthumb won't be available > before F22 is due? The original email was talking about F21. Seems pretty unlikely that it will happen in time, so we need a downgrade (and epoch bump)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
