I see many this messages. But Matthew solution haven't fixed my problem. -Igor Gnatenko On Oct 31, 2014 4:42 PM, "Michal Schmidt" <mschm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/31/2014 02:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Oct 31 09:19:46 ubik systemd[1]: dev-mqueue.mount: Directory /dev/mqueue > to mount over is not empty, mounting anyway. > > Oct 31 09:19:46 ubik mount[4484]: mount: mount point /dev/mqueue does > not exist > > Oct 31 09:19:46 ubik systemd[1]: dev-mqueue.mount mount process exited, > code=exited status=32 > > Oct 31 09:19:46 ubik systemd[1]: Failed to mount POSIX Message Queue > File System. > > I saw this too, but didn't look into it. > > > On a related but different note — is there a way to detect potential > > ordering cycles from a set of RPMs on disk (possibly installed in a > > chroot or something) _without_ actually booting? Maybe we could add a > > taskotron check for that for packages with changes to systemd unit > > files. (I realize that what is enabled on people's systems will have an > > impact, but we could check against a set of defaults at least.) > > It's not the perfect solution, but this command would report > the cycle you saw: > /usr/lib/systemd/systemd --test --system > > Michal > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct