2014-10-17 16:00 GMT+02:00 Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Yep, this again. I'm just as thrilled as you are. 3.5 is necessary for > > proper ppc64le support, as well as some minor radeonsi features in Mesa. > > And massively improved aarch64 support > > > One problem this time around appears to be python-llvmpy, which appears > > to have decided that llvm 3.2/3.3 are the only versions it will support: > > > > > https://github.com/llvmpy/llvmpy/commit/1e141931b874dd0bc3d8e9d801b949939430ad4e > > > > We're already shipping it built against 3.4, so that's truly charming. > > I'm open to suggestions here. > > It doesn't look, with a basic repoquery test, that anything in the > core distro needs python-llvmpy so my general feeling is to query > upstream to see what their intentions are regarding support of newer > releases and if they don't intend to keep up then just drop > python-llvmpy at least for the time being unless the Fedora maintainer > plans to fix it RSN. >
I initially had intentions to package numba, and other pyhton goodies that depend on python-llvmpy, but I haven't worked on it on a very long time. So I'm OK with retiring python-llvmpy if a patch doesn't appear soon. in the tracking bug for 3.5 https://github.com/llvmpy/llvmpy/issues/106 Sergio
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
