> The expected security improvement is essentially nonexistent. In the current
> case of importing functions from the environment (and we could have a looong
> philosophical conversation about whether this is a vulnerability in bash or
> in its callers, where the likely outcome is “not a vulnerability in bash but
> by far easiest to fix in bash”)

> Why would this be a philosophical discussion when there were clearly bugs in
> the parser allowing things it shouldn't even if you consider the use cases
> valid otherwise?

As I said in the snipped part, anyone able to submit arbitrary input to a shell 
can already cause it to do arbitrary things. The parser bugs do not give the 
attacker anything they don’t already have, so they are not security-relevant. 
So we are back to the philosophical discussion about where is the vulnerability 
in putting untrusted data into the environment. 
Mirek 
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to